Journal article
IEEE/ACM, Transactions on Networking, 2017, p. 1
APA
Click to copy
Bolla, R., Bruschi, R., Carrega, A., Davoli, F., & Pajo, J. F. (2017). Corrections to: "Green Networking with Packet Processing Engines: Modeling and Optimization" Transactions on Networking, 1. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNET.2017.2761892
Chicago/Turabian
Click to copy
Bolla, Raffaele, Roberto Bruschi, Alessandro Carrega, Franco Davoli, and Jane Frances Pajo. “Corrections to: &Quot;Green Networking with Packet Processing Engines: Modeling and Optimization&Quot;” Edited by IEEE/ACM. Transactions on Networking (2017): 1.
MLA
Click to copy
Bolla, Raffaele, et al. “Corrections to: &Quot;Green Networking with Packet Processing Engines: Modeling and Optimization&Quot;” Transactions on Networking, edited by IEEE/ACM, 2017, p. 1, doi:10.1109/TNET.2017.2761892.
BibTeX Click to copy
@article{bolla2017a,
title = {Corrections to: "Green Networking with Packet Processing Engines: Modeling and Optimization"},
year = {2017},
journal = {Transactions on Networking},
pages = {1},
doi = {10.1109/TNET.2017.2761892},
author = {Bolla, Raffaele and Bruschi, Roberto and Carrega, Alessandro and Davoli, Franco and Pajo, Jane Frances},
editor = {IEEE/ACM}
}
🔬 Correcting the Analytical Foundations of Energy-Efficient Packet Processing Systems
Accurate mathematical modeling is essential for understanding the relationship between packet processing performance, queueing delays, and energy consumption in modern communication networks.
Our publication, “Corrections to: Green Networking With Packet Processing Engines: Modeling and Optimization,” provides important corrections to the analytical expressions used in the original study.
The note focuses on an Mˣ/D/1/SET queueing system, which models batch packet arrivals, deterministic service times, and setup behaviour associated with the packet processing engine.
The corrections address four main aspects:
🔹 Mean Queue Length: Revises the expression for the expected number of packets waiting in the queue, denoted by L̄.
🔹 Mean Waiting Time: Provides the corrected expression for W̄, the average time packets spend waiting before service.
🔹 Queueing Model Consistency: Clarifies that L̄ represents the mean number of packets in the queue, not the mean number of packets in the complete system.
🔹 Additional Algebraic Corrections: Identifies changes required in Equations (17), (18), and (23) of the original publication, including removal of a factor β from specific numerators.
📐 Mathematical framework
The analytical model involves several fundamental parameters: - λ Packet batch arrival rate. - β Mean batch size. - τₛ Setup time. - μ Service rate. - ρ System utilisation. - βⱼ Probability of a batch containing j packets.
The revised expressions provide a corrected basis for calculating queueing performance metrics and interpreting the analytical results of the original model.
📊 Scientific implications
✅ Mathematical correctness: Resolves errors in previously published analytical expressions.
✅ Model interpretation: Distinguishes queue occupancy from total system occupancy.
✅ Analytical consistency: Aligns the corrected waiting-time expression with the corresponding probability-generating-function derivation cited in the correction note.
✅ Research reproducibility: Provides researchers with corrected formulas for subsequent calculations and independent verification.
✅ Green networking analysis: Strengthens the mathematical foundation for evaluating packet processing systems that incorporate energy-saving mechanisms.
🎯 Key contribution: Correcting the analytical characterization of queue length and waiting time in the Mˣ/D/1/SET model, supporting more reliable mathematical evaluation of energy-efficient packet processing engines.
Scientific note: This publication is a correction note rather than a new experimental study. It provides revised analytical expressions but does not, on the supplied page, establish new energy savings, latency reductions, or performance improvements. The infographic's mathematical expressions should be verified against the published equations before academic reuse.

🌱⚡ Even the Smallest Mathematical Correction Can Make a Big Difference in Green Networking! 📡🔬
What happens when a mathematical expression used to model network performance contains an error?
In networking research, analytical models help us understand packet processing, queueing delays, and the relationship between energy efficiency and performance. Even a small mistake in an equation can affect the accuracy of subsequent calculations.
Our publication, “Corrections to: Green Networking With Packet Processing Engines: Modeling and Optimization,” addresses this challenge by refining the mathematical foundations of the original research.
The correction focuses on the Mˣ/D/1/SET queueing model, used to analyse packet processing systems with batch arrivals, deterministic service times, and setup behaviour.
🔍 What needed correction?
🔹 Mathematical expressions describing the average number of packets waiting in a queue. 🔹 The formula for calculating the average packet waiting time. 🔹 Additional algebraic terms appearing in related equations. 🔹 A clarification distinguishing packets waiting in the queue from packets present in the entire system.
The manga-inspired infographic illustrates how correcting these mathematical expressions contributes to more accurate analytical modeling and provides a sounder foundation for studying energy-efficient packet processing.
🎯 The message: Scientific progress is not only about discovering something new. It is also about verifying, correcting, and strengthening the foundations of existing research.
